Define the source landscape
Identify systems, record families, configuration, integrations, agents, customers, regions, and owners in scope.
Migration assessment
Map the safest path from your current stack to RadiantOS
Share a non-sensitive overview of source systems, scale, priorities, dependencies, timing, and evidence so migration feasibility can be evaluated without guessing.
Feasibility before commitment
Why RadiantOS
What changes for your MSP.
Surface migration risk
Review API access, data quality, unsupported behavior, dependencies, coexistence, recovery, and cutover constraints.
Create a verification outline
Agree what must reconcile and which user-level workflows must pass before the old stack can be retired.
From signal to proof
Migration assessment: a clear operating path.
- Describe
Provide a safe source overview
Name products and approximate scope without submitting API keys, exports, secrets, or customer records through the public form.
- Evaluate
Review evidence and unknowns
Identify known API paths, required documentation, gaps, dependencies, and stop conditions.
- Plan
Outline discovery and verification
Define the next controlled step, required access, owners, dry-run scope, acceptance tests, and cutover decision.
Migration assessment
What your team can do.
Stack inventory
RMM, PSA, backup, vault, network, cloud, documentation, security, billing, integrations, and reporting sources.
Risk and dependency review
Source access, contracts, data, identities, workflows, customizations, provider limits, regions, and business timing.
Validation framework
Record counts, configuration checks, agent coverage, integration tests, restore checks, role workflows, and customer acceptance.
Built for MSP control
Control stays with your MSP.
RadiantOS keeps scope, access, approval, data placement, and audit evidence visible where the decision happens.
Review the security approachAssessment is not a migration guarantee
Feasibility depends on source documentation, live access, data condition, supported behavior, product scope, and agreed decisions.
No secrets in the public request
API credentials, exports, customer data, private hostnames, and security evidence require a separately approved secure exchange path.
Scope the migration safely
Scope the move before you commit.
Share the source systems, operating scope, timing, and dependencies that need a controlled migration path.
- Name source products and approximate scope without sending exports or credentials.
- Surface dependencies, timing, unsupported behavior, and workflows that cannot be interrupted.
- Use the assessment to define feasibility and evidence—not to imply a cutover guarantee.
Questions, answered
What MSP teams ask about Migration assessment.
What information should I provide first?
List source products, approximate customers, endpoints and users, priority data and workflows, target timing, and major custom integrations.
Should I send API keys with the request?
No. Credentials should be provided only through an approved secure workflow after scope and purpose are confirmed.
Does the assessment include cutover?
It defines feasibility and next steps. Execution, validation, cutover, and retirement require a separately approved migration plan.